AI regulation in gambling tracker
The short answer
We track 12 measures on AI in gambling in 7 jurisdictions: 6 in force or enacted and 3 pending, as of September 24, 2026.
Laws, binding rules, guidance, voluntary codes and regulator statements on how gambling companies may use AI — from the EU AI Act and Malta's AI Gaming Charter to US state rules and federal bills.
Data through September 2026Updated Every row links to its source
AI regulation in gambling tracker · 12 entriesUpdated Oct 10, 2026
Count
12: Measures tracked on AI in gambling
Next date
Dec 2, 2026
European Union: Deadline for providers of generative systems already on the market before 2 Aug 2026 to comply with Art. 50(2) marking of synthetic content
AI in gambling: by jurisdiction
12 entries
| Jurisdiction | Measure | Status | Last action | Next | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, USUS-MA | MGC staff review of operator AI use — Regulator review of how licensed sportsbooks use AI and machine learningAfter a New York Times report on DraftKings, MGC Chair Jordan Maynard told staff to engage with DraftKings and to look at how all licensed operators use AI and machine learning. The Commission has made no finding and proposed no rule; Maynard said any further action or policymaking would be decided later. | Review announced (fact-finding) | Sep 24, 2026 | — | Record ↗ |
| MaltaMT | MGA AI Gaming Charter — Voluntary principles for ethical and responsible AI use by gaming licenseesThe MGA and the Malta Digital Innovation Authority published a voluntary, principles-based charter that covers transparency, fairness, data governance and human oversight of AI used anywhere in gaming operations, applied in proportion to risk. It creates no new legal obligations; licensees that adopt it are encouraged to name internal responsible persons for AI and to keep up AI literacy. Effective September 18, 2026. | Launched (voluntary) | Sep 18, 2026 | — | Record ↗ |
| European UnionEU | EU AI Act, Article 50 (transparency) — Disclosure duties for chatbots and labelling of AI-generated contentSince 2 August 2026, most of the AI Act applies, including transparency rules: people must be told when they are interacting with an AI system such as a chatbot, and some AI-generated content, including deepfakes, must be labelled. This covers gambling operators that use AI customer-service bots or generative marketing content in the EU. Effective August 2, 2026. | Applicable from 2 August 2026 | Aug 2, 2026 | Dec 2, 2026Deadline for providers of generative systems already on the market before 2 Aug 2026 to comply with Art. 50(2) marking of synthetic content | Record ↗ |
| European UnionEU | AI Omnibus (amending the EU AI Act) — Simplification package that pushed back the AI Act's high-risk deadlinesThe AI Omnibus, proposed on 19 Nov 2025 with political agreement on 7 May 2026, entered into force on 27 July 2026. It moved the rules for Annex III high-risk AI to 2 Dec 2027 and those for Annex I product-embedded AI to 2 Aug 2028, and it softened the AI-literacy duty for companies. Effective July 27, 2026. | In force | Jul 27, 2026 | Dec 2, 2026New Art. 5 bans on AI that generates non-consensual intimate imagery or CSAM start to apply | Record ↗ |
| Great BritainGB | UKGC speech: John Pierce at the GAMLG Annual Conference — Enforcement director warns that AI-based AML tools often fall shortUKGC Director of Enforcement John Pierce said the Commission is not against operators using AI or algorithms for anti-money-laundering. He added that the evidence so far shows they too often fail to deliver what is required, so operators should make sure such tools achieve compliance before launching them. | Speech (no new rule) | Jun 10, 2026 | — | Record ↗ |
| Great BritainGB | CAP enforcement notice on gambling content marketing (AI Active Ad Monitoring sweep) — AI-powered sweep for gambling content marketing that strongly appeals to under-18sThe Gambling Commission told operators that the Committee of Advertising Practice would start a compliance sweep on 11 June 2026 using the ASA's AI-based Active Ad Monitoring System, working with social media platforms, to find content marketing with strong appeal to under-18s. Ads found in breach must be amended or removed, and operators that do not comply can be referred to the platform or to the Commission. The monitoring tool belongs to CAP/ASA, not the Commission. Effective June 11, 2026. | Sweep launched 11 June 2026 | Jun 4, 2026 | — | Record ↗ |
| Colorado, USUS-CO | SB26-189 (Automated Decision-Making Technology; replaces Colorado AI Act SB24-205) — Cross-sector AI law rewritten as notice and disclosure rules for automated consequential decisionsThe act repeals and reenacts the 2024 Colorado AI Act. It requires notice, documentation and post-adverse-outcome explanations when automated tools materially influence 'consequential decisions' in education, employment, housing, financial or lending services, insurance, health care and government services. Gambling is not a listed area, so it is unclear whether it reaches gambling operators beyond those categories (for example, employment decisions). Effective January 1, 2027. | Signed; obligations start 1 Jan 2027 | May 14, 2026 | Jan 1, 2027Developer and deployer obligations start; attorney general must adopt rules on post-adverse-outcome disclosures by this date | Record ↗ |
| AustraliaAU | ACMA: AI and interactive gambling – sector developments report — Regulator report on how licensed wagering providers use AIThe ACMA reviewed how licensed providers use AI (odds setting, personalised promotions, generative content, harm and fraud detection). It flagged risks such as 'hyper-nudging' and agentic AI, and said the Interactive Gambling Act framework was not drafted with modern AI in mind. The ACMA described the report as informing policy dialogue rather than an immediate call for legislative reform. | Report published (not a regulatory instrument) | Apr 22, 2026 | — | Record ↗ |
| Great BritainGB | The Commission's approach to Artificial Intelligence (Corporate Strategy 2024-27 appendix) — UKGC's own AI principles and plan to understand and regulate industry AI useThe Commission uses the OECD definition of AI and sets a low or minimal risk appetite for its own AI use, which must be lawful, transparent, under human oversight and consistent with the licensing objectives. Its listed aims include understanding and, where appropriate, regulating industry AI use and using AI for compliance work; it adds no new requirements for licensees. | Published policy (no licensee requirements) | Jan 5, 2026 | — | Record ↗ |
| United States (federal)US | SAFE Bet Act of 2025 (H.R. 2087 / S. 1033) — Federal sports-betting standards bill that would ban some operator AI usesThe bill would set federal minimum standards for state sports betting, including that operators may not use AI to track an individual's wagers, create offers or promotions targeting a specific individual, or create gambling products such as microbets. It was introduced in the House on 11 March 2025 and in the Senate on 13 March 2025, and GovTrack shows no further action. | Introduced; referred to committee | Mar 13, 2025 | — | Record ↗ |
| European UnionEU | EU AI Act, Article 5 (prohibited practices) — Ban on manipulative AI and AI that exploits vulnerabilitiesAI systems that use subliminal, manipulative or deceptive techniques, or that exploit vulnerabilities due to age, disability or a specific social or economic situation, to materially distort behaviour in ways likely to cause significant harm are banned EU-wide. The AI-literacy duties also started on this date; both are relevant to AI-driven gambling personalisation and marketing. Effective February 2, 2025. | In force (applicable since 2 Feb 2025) | Feb 2, 2025 | Dec 2, 2026Omnibus-added bans on AI that generates non-consensual intimate imagery or CSAM start to apply | Record ↗ |
| Massachusetts, USUS-MA | 205 CMR 257.02 (sports wagering data use) — Ban on using AI that makes betting platforms more addictive to target wagers or offersSports wagering operators may not use patron data to promote specific wagers or offers based on any algorithm, machine learning or AI system that they or their vendor know, or reasonably expect, makes the platform more addictive. Operators must also report to the MGC every six months on how they use patron data to support responsible gaming. Effective September 1, 2023. | In force | Jun 21, 2024 | — | Record ↗ |
Stage bar: introduced · committee · passed one chamber · passed both · signed · in force.
Methodology
Listed from regulators’ and legislatures’ own publications wherever they could be retrieved; where a primary page was unavailable we cite the most direct secondary report and say so in the entry. Guidance, voluntary codes, consultations and formal speeches count, not only laws, and each entry says plainly whether it binds anyone. Status reflects the latest action we could verify on the date shown.
Download the full table as CSV. Free to reuse with a link to this page; see reusing our data.
Spotted an error? Email corrections@aigamblingdaily.com. Corrections are logged on the corrections page.